Skip to main content
· 4/6/2004

Melanie Stratton Jeffrey Stratton, Her Husband v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co

Citations

  • 363 F.3d 250
  • 32 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2326
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 6500
  • 2004 WL 729065

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a company makes a conscientious effort to keep a claimant apprised of information it had at its disposal and provides the reasons behind its decisions, the arbitrary and capricious standard will not be heightened
  • assuming that plaintiff had no ERISA or claims experience and defendant, a large company, was highly experienced
  • assuming that individual employee had no reason to have ERISA or claims experience, whereas the plan administrator “had numerous such claims”
  • assuming that plaintiff had no ERISA or claims experience and that defendant, a large company, was highly experienced
  • considering an ERISA plan's funding and decisionmaking mechanisms in deciding on a level of review
  • upholding district court’s finding that the insurer did not act arbitrarily by refusing to defer to a report from patient’s treating physician

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Nygaard, Oberdorfer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.