Skip to main content
· 10/16/2000

Mejias Miranda v. BBII Acquisition Corp.

Citations

  • 120 F. Supp. 2d 157
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16266
  • 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,289
  • 2000 WL 1683332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “the same conclusion must be reached” under Law 100 as under Laws 69 and 3 in an employment pregnancy discrimination case
  • denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment of Law Nos. 3 and 69 claims because a genuine issue of fact exists as to plaintiffs claim for pregnancy discrimination under Title VII
  • no personal liability can attach to agents and supervisors under Title VII or the ADEA
  • In order to satisfy that she was replaced, employee must demonstrate that her employer undertook the action in a non-gender neutral manner
  • discussing burden shifting analysis under Law 100

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dominguez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.