Mejia v. Santana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that the “arising out of’ language refers to a causal relationship, whereas “relates to” does not
• opining that the \arising out of\ language refers to a causal relationship, whereas \relates to\ does not
• concluding, as to Connecticut’s long-arm statute providing specific jurisdiction over cases that “arise out of’ a defendant’s forum contacts, that the statute “does not require a causal connection between the defendant’s forum-directed activities and the plaintiffs’ lawsuit”
• stating that the Connecticut long-arm statute permits a trial court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant “only if the defendant’s intrastate activities meet the requirements both of our statute and of the due process clause of the federal constitution”
• stating that the Connecticut long-arm statute permits a trial court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant “only if the defendant’s intrastate activities meet the requirements both of our statute and of the due process clause of the federal constitution”
• stating that the Connecticut long-arm statute permits a trial court to exercise personal jurisdiction over a foreign defendant “only if the defendant’s intrastate activities meet the requirements both of our statute and of the due process clause of the federal constitution”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).