Mejia v. Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Ninth Circuit precedent squarely foreclosed habeas claim that admission of impermissible propensity evidence violated petitioner’s clearly established due process rights
• noting that Ninth Circuit precedent squarely foreclosed habeas claim that admission of impermissible propensity evidence violated petitioner’s clearly established due process rights
• noting that Ninth Circuit precedent squarely foreclosed habeas claim that admission of impermissible propensity evidence violated petitioner’s clearly established due process rights
• noting that Ninth Circuit precedent squarely foreclosed habeas claim that admission of impermissible propensity evidence violated petitioner’s clearly established due process rights
• explaining that the admission of propensity evidence is not contrary to clearly established Supreme Court precedent, and the state court did not act unreasonably in finding no due process violation
• rejecting habeas claim that admission of sexual propensity evidence under Cal. Evid. Code § 1108 violates due process

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).