Skip to main content
· 9/6/2007

Mejia-Orellana v. Gonzales

Citations

  • 502 F.3d 13
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21295
  • 2007 WL 2510148

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the statute governing cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a), is discretionary and thus does not create a cognizable liberty interest
  • finding that the statute governing cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a), is discretionary and thus does not create a cognizable liberty interest
  • “The natural reading of ‘lawful’ connotes moré than just procedural regularity; it suggests that the substance of an action complied with the governing law.” (quoting De La Rosa v. U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 489 F.3d 551, 554 (2d Cir. 2007

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Selya, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.