Mejia-Haffner v. Killington, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an interactive website, accessible in New York, does not subject a party to jurisdiction, and that the “claim asserted [requires] some relationship to the business transacted via the website”
• noting that although the defendant allegedly maintained a “website through which a person in New York could purchase services and the alleged tort that occurred,” there were insufficient allegations to hold motion at issue in abeyance for jurisdictional discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).