Meissl v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the SVP level in a DOT listing indicating unskilled work, does not address whether a job entails 26 only simple, repetitive tasks,” which is “more squarely addressed by the GED [reasoning level] ratings”
• finding 19 no conflict between limitation to simple/routine tasks and jobs with a reasoning level of R2
• finding no conflict between limitation to simple/routine tasks and jobs with a reasoning level of R2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).