Meisenhelder v. Zipp Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the doctrine of fraudulent concealment was inapplicable when the plaintiff admitted he knew of the breach
• concluding that a promissory estoppel claim failed because it was based on a promise embodied in a written employment contract
• holding breach occurred in 1987 and defendant’s subsequent refusals to honor the parties’ contract did not constitute a continuous breach

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).