Meisel v. Grunberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged a co-defendant’s indirect liability for fraud pursuant to an agency theory of vicarious liability
• noting that, under federal common law, apparent agency “cannot be established by the actions or representations of the agent”
• finding a co-defendant indirectly liable for fraud pursuant to an agency theory of vicarious liability
• “Under New York law, a claim for civil conspiracy may stand only if it is connected to a separate underlying tort.” (citations omitted)
• “[C]onspiracy to commit a tort such as fraud is not an independent cause of action.... ”
• \Knowledge acquired by an agent acting within the scope of its agency is imputed to the principal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).