Meisberger v. Donahue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Arguments and evidence that could have been raised in the opening brief but are first raised in a reply brief are waived.\
• “[T]he rule would not be operative unless it could be shown that the employee was given a project that he wouldn’t ordinarily be working on.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).