Skip to main content
· 2/11/1994

Meintzer v. Weinberg

Citations

  • 441 S.E.2d 774
  • 212 Ga. App. 307
  • 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 674
  • 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because all the plaintiffs’ peremptory challenges were exhausted in striking jurors, including one juror who should have been stricken for cause, new trial was required
  • failure to excuse juror where questioning revealed he could not be objective was an abuse of discretion
  • failure to excuse juror where questioning revealed he could not be objective was an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Birdsong, Andrews

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.