Meinhard v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining State v. Ford, 137 Wn.2d 472, 973 P.2d 452 (1999) (challenge to offender score calculation permitted despite failure to object in trial court)
• Because the “no second chance” rule was rooted in judicial economy rather than due process concerns, legislature had authority to enact the statutory remand provision of RCW 9.94A.530(2)
• even an unpreserved error can still be asserted on appeal if “the sentence is based on information that is false, lacks a minimum indici[um] of reliability, or is unsupported in the record.”
• amended statute is constitutional and 6 No. 34639-1-III State v. Mendez permits all relevant evidence to be considered by sentencing court so as to reflect the offender's actual criminal history, whether at sentencing or resentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).