Skip to main content
· 9/16/2002

Meiners v. University of Kansas

Citations

  • 239 F. Supp. 2d 1175
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19412
  • 2002 WL 31296170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that timing of protected activity and adverse employment action “can provide sufficient support for plaintiff’s prima facie case . . .”
  • observing that refusal to reconsider an earlier employ- ment decision “would be a normal incident” of the prior decision ra- ther than “a separate adverse employment action”
  • “Timing alone can provide sufficient support for plaintiff’s prima facie case, but it is not alone sufficient to make a showing of pretext.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vratil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.