Meindl v. Genesys Pacific Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that one-year limitation of HRCP Rule 60(b) barred plaintiff from seeking relief under HRCP Rule 60(b)(3) because plaintiff failed to timely request relief
• noting that one-year limitation of HRCP Rule 60(b) barred plaintiff from seeking relief under HRCP Rule 60(b)(3
• determining that the plaintiffs prayer for relief in the form of “general, special, treble, and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial” in its complaint was sufficiently specific for purposes of HRCP Rule 9(g
• determining that the plaintiffs prayer for relief in the form of “general, special, treble, and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial” in its complaint was sufficiently specific for purposes of HRCP Rule 9(g) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• stating that \Hawaii's rules of notice pleading require that a complaint set forth a short and plain statement of the claim that provides defendant with fair notice of what the plaintiff's claim is and the grounds upon which the claim rests\ (citations omitted)
• stating that “Hawaii’s rules of notice pleading require that a complaint set forth a short and plain statement of the claim that provides defendant with fair notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which the claim rests” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).