· 5/15/1991
Meiksin v. Howard Hanna Co., Inc.
Citations
- 590 A.2d 1303
- 404 Pa. Super. 417
- 1991 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1375
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- The denial of a motion for summary judgment “suggests that there was competent evidence of sufficient quantity and quality to demonstrate probable cause for a reasonable belief that the action could be maintained”
- where Dragonetti plaintiffs in prior lawsuit unsuccessfully moved pre-trial for summary judgment and had compulsory non-suit denied, probable cause existed as matter of law in prior lawsuit to defeat Dragonetti action
- plaintiff must show that “the defendant lacked probable cause to institute the proceedings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rowley, Wieand, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.