Skip to main content
· 3/26/2010

MEIJER STORES LTD. PARTNERSHIP v. Smith

Citations

  • 926 N.E.2d 1134
  • 2010 Ind. Tax LEXIS 10
  • 2010 WL 1170096

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the taxpayer’s USPAP (Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice) compliant appraisal and other market-based evidence were sufficient to establish true tax value
  • noting that the use of vacant properties within a sales comparison approach is appropriate so long as they “were used for [the same] purposes both pre- and post-sale.”
  • explaining that pursuant to the sales comparison approach, the market value-in-use of a retail property should be measured against properties with a comparable use as opposed to properties with identical users
  • indicating that a newly constructed Meijer store was adversely impacted by obsolescence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fisher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.