Meighen v. Strong

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a finding of an error of law is a legitimate ground for reversal
• holding that a finding of an error of law is a legitimate ground for reversal
• holding that a finding of an error of law is a legitimate ground for reversal
• stating that the trial judge is best able to view the witnesses and observe their demeanor, gestures, and voice inflections, and use these observations in weighing the credibility of the proffered testimony
• employing a civil manifest weight standard of review when reviewing a piercing the corporate veil claim
• stating that \an appellate court should not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court when there exists * * * competent and credible evidence supporting the findings of fact and conclusions of law rendered by the trial judge\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).