Mei Juan Zheng v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that applicants are entitled to various “procedural safeguards” prior to having a finding of frivolousness entered against them
• suggesting BIA consider applicability of timely recantation doctrine in context of frivolousness filing based on withdrawn asylum application
• “A 11 person who makes an application for asylum determined to be ‘frivolous,’ or 12 deliberately and materially false, is subject to a grave penalty: permanent 13 ineligibility for most forms of relief under the immigration laws.”
• giving Chevron deference to Matter of X-M-C-

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).