Skip to main content
· 7/30/2004

Mehus v. Emporia State University

Citations

  • 326 F. Supp. 2d 1213
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14756
  • 2004 WL 1724849

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the plaintiff’s “knowledge that [a witness] occupied a position at issue in this case is no substitute for [Defendant’s] compliance with Rule 26.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vratil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.