S.D. New York· 8/29/1989
Mehta v. Surles
Citations
- 720 F. Supp. 324
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10290
- 1989 WL 100271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A right to a particular procedure cannot exist in a vacuum and must be linked to a right to life, liberty or property.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goettel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- DuLaney v. Oklahoma State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1993-09-21· cited 73×
- Stewart v. RoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1990-07-17· cited 38×
- Mehta v. SurlesSecond Circuit· 1990-05-29· cited 23×
- Morillo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-03-26· cited 18×
- Navarro Carrilo v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.S.D. Illinois· 2019-06-13· cited 12×
- Drayton v. Toys 'R' US Inc.S.D. New York· 2009-07-17· cited 10×
- MacNamara v. County Council of Sussex CountyD. Delaware· 1990-05-25· cited 8×
- Westmarc Communications, Inc. v. Conn. Dept. of Public Utility ControlD. Connecticut· 1990-06-20· cited 7×
- Rattner v. NetburnS.D. New York· 1989-03-27· cited 5×
- Filteau v. PrudentiS.D. New York· 2016-02-17· cited 5×
- Ramapo Homeowners' Ass'n v. New York State Office of Mental RetardationS.D. New York· 2002-01-16· cited 3×
- Valdez v. City of East HartfordD. Connecticut· 1998-09-29· cited 2×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 7,676×
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 7,112×
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1981-05-18· cited 6,693×
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1982-06-25· cited 4,631×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 3,324×
- Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court· 1983-04-26· cited 3,076×
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 2,187×
- Harris v. McRaeSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 1,702×
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,570×
- F. S. Royster Guano Co. v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1920-06-07· cited 1,251×
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court· 1946-05-27· cited 1,036×
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-12-04· cited 940×
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 906×
- David HUEBSCHEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES and Jacquelyn Rader, Defendants-AppellantsSeventh Circuit· 1983-09-13· cited 175×
- Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1922-12-04· cited 169×
- Sharrock v. Dell Buick-Cadillac, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1978-07-11· cited 148×
- San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-12-26· cited 83×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.