· 8/19/2004
Mehta v. Shah
Citations
- 113 F. App'x 165
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming dismissal of idea misappropriation claim “since [plaintiff] cannot, in the absence of either a contract or quasi-contract, allege the requisite legal relationship between it and [defendant] to state [such a] claim”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Evans, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.