Skip to main content
· 8/19/2004

Mehta v. Shah

Citations

  • 113 F. App'x 165

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal of idea misappropriation claim “since [plaintiff] cannot, in the absence of either a contract or quasi-contract, allege the requisite legal relationship between it and [defendant] to state [such a] claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Evans, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.