Mehrtash v. Mehrtash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that transfer of real property was not a fraudulent transfer because property was heavily mortgaged and “Plaintiff produced no evidence that the value of the property could support any net recovery for her in the event the conveyance were set aside.”
• “Plaintiff produced no evidence 9 10 that the value of the property could support any net recovery for her in the event the 11 conveyance were set aside.”
• in action to set aside transfer under California Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, appellate court affirmed trial court's judgment for defendants where plaintiff failed to prove that she was injured by subject transfer
• “It cannot be said that a creditor has been injured unless the transfer puts beyond her reach property she otherwise would be able to subject to the payment of her debt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).