Mehren v. McKey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the statement that “Japonais denies that they violated the Fair Labor Standards Act” to be sufficient information about defendants’ defenses
• approving notice statement that explained that the defendant “denies that they violated the Fair Labor Standards Act”
• finding sufficient a statement that “[Defendant] denies . . . [it] violated the Fair Labor Standards Act”
• “[B]ecause the description of Plaintiffs’ FLSA claim is brief, the statement that ‘Japonais denies that they violated the Fair Labor Standards Act’ is sufficient.”
• \[T]here is no requirement in this circuit that a certain number of Covered Employees opt-in before a court can conditionally certify a class.\
• “Because the notice states that opt-in plaintiffs can select their own counsel, there is only a minimal risk that opt-in plaintiffs will be discouraged from seeking their own counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).