Meghan Mollett v. Netflix, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating the elements of a VPPA claim, including 15 the disclosure of personally identifiable information
• affirming dismissal of VPPA claim because the defendant streaming service only made the alleged disclosures to the consumer
• describing how many modern gaming systems allow their users to stream videos through platforms like Netflix
• seeming to accept 5 Netflix as a “video tape service provider” without further discussion
• court may dismiss under Rule 21 12(b)(b) based on “a lack of a cognizable legal theory”
• the court must accept all 27 well-pleaded factual allegations as true and construe the complaint in the light most 28 favorable to the non-moving party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).