Meeting House Lane, Ltd. v. Melso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the parties have the right to make their own contract, and it is not the function of a court to rewrite it or to give it a construction in conflict with the accepted and plain meaning of the language used”
• “[Rule 227.1’s] purpose is to provide the trial court with an opportunity to review and reconsider its earlier rulings and correct its own error”
• “One part of a contract cannot be interpreted so as to annul another part, and a contract must be construed, if possible, to give effect to all of its terms.”
• “[Rule 227.1’s] purpose is to provide the trial court with an opportunity to review and reconsider its earlier rulings and correct its own error”
• “One part of a contract cannot be interpreted so as to annul another part, and a contract must be construed, if possible, to give effect to all of its terms.”
• guaranty contracts subject to same rules of interpretation as other agreements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).