Skip to main content
· 7/27/1882

Meeks v. Southern Pacific R. R.

Citations

  • 61 Cal. 149
  • 1882 Cal. LEXIS 568

Syllabus

<p>Statute of Limitations—Amendment to Complaint—Variance.—The original complaint alleged that by reason of injuries inflicted upon the plaintiff’s son by the defendant the plaintiff had been compelled to pay certain sums of money for surgical and medical attention, etc., amounting in the aggregate to three hundred and sixty-nine dollars. The complaint, more than four years after the cause of action accrued, was amended so as to allege that the plaintiff paid a portion of the said amount and incurred liability for the balance prior to the beginning of the suit.</p> <p>Held: The cause of action to recover the sum for which the plaintiff had become liable, but which he had not paid, was barred by the statute of limitations.</p>

Judges: McKinstry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.