Meeks v. Meeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because of the mandatory language of the statute on 13 withholding orders . . . we find clear error in failing either to enter such an order or to give reasons as to why it was not justified.”
• “Because of the mandatory language of the statute on 13 withholding orders . . . we find clear error in failing either to enter such an order or to give reasons as to why it was not justified.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McNeese v. McNeese
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2013-04-25· cited 74×
• Evans v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2011-04-26· cited 52×
• Brawdy v. Howell
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2003-04-01· cited 20×
• Olson v. Olson
  Court of Appeals of Mississippi· 2001-11-06· cited 2×
• Kenton H. McNeese v. Katherine J. McNeese
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2011-12-31

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tedford v. Dempsey
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1983-09-14· cited 168×
• Morreale v. Morreale
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1994-12-21· cited 66×
• Morris v. Morris
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1989-04-05· cited 57×
• Shipley v. Ferguson
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1994-06-23· cited 55×
• Overstreet v. Overstreet
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1997-04-17· cited 29×
• Bland v. Bland
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1993-12-09· cited 25×
• Childers v. Childers
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1998-07-23· cited 25×
• Roberts v. Roberts
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1981-03-11· cited 18×
• Haddon v. Haddon
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2000-03-30· cited 14×