Meeker v. Hays

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the opinion of a non-examining medical expert . . . may be considered substantial evidence” where such consistency exists
• finding that ALJ’s determination regarding credibility of plaintiff’s testimony was supported by substantial evidence where ALJ noted that plaintiff testified that he performed grocery shopping and “occasionally cooked, cleaned, dusted and did housework”
• “Moreover, the opinion of a non-examining medical expert … may be considered substantial evidence if consistent with the record as a whole.”
• “Moreover, the opinion of a non-examining medical expert … may be considered substantial evidence if consistent with the record as a whole.”
• “[T]he opinion of a non- examining medical expert . . . may be considered substantial evidence if consistent with the record as a whole.”
• “Moreover, the opinion of a non-examining medical expert … may be considered substantial evidence if consistent with the record as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).