Meehan v. Smith
Citations
- 192 N.E.3d 1214
- 2022 Ohio 2359
Syllabus
Legal malpractice express attorney-client relationship implied attorney-client relationship beneficiary of trust/will trustee of trust corporate officer summary judgment. The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of attorneys. The attorneys did not represent appellant, either expressly or impliedly. The attorneys did not represent appellant individually or in any of her roles as a beneficiary of the subject trusts and will, as a trustee of the trusts, or as a corporate officer. Thus, no attorney-client relationship was formed between appellant and appellees and the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of the appellees on appellant's legal malpractice action.
Judges: O'Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.