Meehan v. Adams Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting language stating that consequential damages may be recovered for fraudulent misrepresentations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. Wichita State University
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1975-06-09· cited 90×
• Bowling v. Ansted Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge, Inc.
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1992-12-11· cited 57×
• Amoco Chemicals Corporation v. Bach
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-07-11· cited 49×
• Speer v. Dighton Grain, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1981-02-28· cited 34×
• International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Cardwell Manufacturing Co.
  D. Kansas· 1976-05-11· cited 23×
• State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Commemorative Services Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1991-12-31· cited 15×
• Marcus Food Co. v. Family Foods of Tallahassee, Inc.
  D. Kansas· 1990-01-29· cited 12×
• INTERN. U., UNITED AUTO., ETC. v. Cardwell Mfg. Co.
  D. Kansas· 1976-05-11· cited 11×
• Alexander v. Certified Master Builder Corp.
  D. Kansas· 1999-03-26· cited 7×
• BioCore, Inc. v. Khosrowshahi
  D. Kansas· 1999-01-05

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kilpatrick Bros., Inc. v. Poynter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1970-07-17· cited 48×
• Kilbourn v. Western Surety Co.
  Tenth Circuit· 1951-02-27· cited 37×
• Klockner v. Keser
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1971-07-07· cited 12×
• James E. Blair and Bertha N. Blair v. Iron Mueller
  Tenth Circuit· 1962-01-26· cited 5×