New York Court of Appeals· 12/27/1984
Meegan S. v. Donald T.
Citations
- 64 N.Y.2d 751
- 475 N.E.2d 449
- 485 N.Y.S.2d 982
- 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding final decision is one that ends litigation on merits and leaves nothing for court to do but execute judgment
- “[ojrdinarily, a dismissal based on Statute of Limitations is considered to be ‘on the merits’, precluding relitigation of that issue in a subsequent action”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hodes v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals· 1987-10-22· cited 102×
- Evelyn Deloris Bray v. New York Life InsuranceSecond Circuit· 1988-06-28· cited 36×
- Estate of Re v. Kornstein Veisz & WexlerS.D. New York· 1997-04-02· cited 24×
- Pharr v. Evergreen Garden, Inc.Second Circuit· 2005-01-25· cited 20×
- Ruotolo v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals· 1994-02-17· cited 19×
- Farkas v. New York State Department of Civil ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-10-10· cited 11×
- McGuirk v. City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-04-24· cited 10×
- Saint Mary's Hospital v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-02-28· cited 7×
- Santangelo v. StateNew York State Court of Claims· 1990-11-07· cited 6×
- Seavey v. Chrysler Corp.S.D. New York· 1996-06-12· cited 4×
- Burdick v. Afrimet-Indussa Inc.New York Supreme Court· 1988-02-18· cited 2×
- Hodes v. AxelrodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-03-27· cited 1×
- Hill v. AMMC, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court· 2018-06-29
- Linda I. V. v. Gil R. C.NYC Family Court· 1998-03-27
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Other cases named Meegan S. v. Donald T.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.