Meece v. Moerbe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where successful plaintiff was entitled to attorney’s fees under the former usury statute, appellate attorney’s fees were available in the bill of review proceeding because they would have been available in an appeal of the underlying case
• holding that where successful plaintiff was entitled to attorney’s fees under the former usury statute, appellate attorney’s fees were available in the bill of review proceeding because they would have been available in an appeal of the underlying case
• attorney = s fees for contesting a bill of review proceeding on a usury counterclaim were recoverable under the usury statute
• defendant/counterclaimant in underlying lawsuit prevailed in underlying lawsuit on usury counterclaim for which attorney’s fees were recoverable, and then later successfully defended a bill of review proceeding and was awarded attorney’s fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).