Skip to main content
· 6/11/1887

Mee v. State

Citations

  • 23 Tex. Ct. App. 566
  • 5 S.W. 243
  • 1887 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 123

Syllabus

<p>Forgery—Indictment—Evidence—Variance.—See the opinion in ex-tenso for the substance of an indictment for forgery, and for the contents of the alleged forged instrument, between which two documents there is held to be no variance, wherefore the forged instrument was properly admitted as evidence.</p>

Judges: Hurt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.