Skip to main content
· 6/15/2010

MEE INDUSTRIES v. Dow Chemical Co.

Citations

  • 608 F.3d 1202
  • 76 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1732
  • 95 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1737
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 12175
  • 2010 WL 2367119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming exclusion of evidence of “loss of goodwill” calculation as a category of damages not included in required Rule 26 disclosure of damages sought
  • upholding a district court’s imposition of sanctions on a plaintiff for failure to identify a category of damages until the eve of trial and to ever provide a calculation of that category of damages
  • failure to provide a damage calcu- lation for loss of goodwill damages was not harmless
  • cit- ing D.E. 234 at 33

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus, Fay, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.