Medvid v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where defendant’s predisposition to distribute narcotics was put into issue by entrapment defense, testimony recounting informant’s out-of-court statements to police regarding defendant’s drug-related activities was “highly prejudicial”
• \To establish [that the government merely afforded the defendant an opportunity to satisfy his erimi-nal intent] it is proper for the state to present evidence of prior crimes from which the jury might reasonably infer the accused's predisposition to commit the offense on trial.\
• \To establish [that the government merely afforded the defendant an opportunity to satisfy his criminal intent] it is proper for the state to present evidence of prior crimes from which the jury might reasonably infer the accused's predisposition to commit the offense on trial.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).