Medtronic, Inc. And Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Daig Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a court need not address every sub-argument so long as it articulates its reasoning
• stating that “[t]he patent laws of the United States are the laws governing a determination of obviousness/nonobviousness of a United States patent in a federal court” in disallowing reliance on foreign counterpart
• noting, in patent case, that decision of German tribunal does not bind U.S. courts
• noting, in patent case, that decision of German tribunal does not bind U.S. courts
• “We presume that a fact finder reviews all the evidence presented unless he explicitly expresses otherwise”
• “We presume that a fact finder re- views all the evidence presented unless [it] explicitly ex- presses otherwise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).