Skip to main content
· 2/12/2001

Medtronic Ave, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

Citations

  • 247 F.3d 44
  • 58 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1596
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 6723
  • 2001 WL 387513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that legal questions concerning the applicability and scope of an arbitration agreement is subject to plenary review
  • noting that \arbitrators have the authority to resolve disputes only if the parties have agreed to submit to arbitration\ and that \there must be sufficient evidence that the parties consented to arbitration in an express agreement\
  • explaining that “if the district court engages in contract construction, we exercise plenary review”
  • determining whether manufacturer’s pending patent infringement claims against competitor were subject to mandatory arbitration under . a third-party’s arbitration ■ agreement with competitor following manufacturer’s acquisition of the third party
  • order denying a stay of court proceedings pending arbitration “should not be regarded as appealable as an order denying an interlocutory injunction under [28 U.S.C. § ] 1292(a)(1)”
  • “[T]his appeal [from the denial of a motion to stay pending arbitration] is not from a ‘final decision.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scirica, Fuentes, Greenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.