Skip to main content
· 6/28/2002

Medrano v. Production Engineering Co.

Citations

  • 774 N.E.2d 371
  • 332 Ill. App. 3d 562
  • 266 Ill. Dec. 265
  • 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that late amendments to answers are generally impermissible if the opposing party would be prejudiced or surprised
  • recognizing that late amendments to answers are generally impermissible if the opposing party would be prejudiced or surprised
  • “[A] party may well assert a limitations period defense in its summary judgment motion ***.”
  • \[A] party may well assert a limitations period defense in its summary judgment motion***.\
  • \[A] party may well assert a limitations period defense in its summary judgment motion***.\
  • “a party may file a motion for summary judgment at any time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Burke, Cahill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.