· 6/28/2002
Medrano v. Production Engineering Co.
Citations
- 774 N.E.2d 371
- 332 Ill. App. 3d 562
- 266 Ill. Dec. 265
- 2002 Ill. App. LEXIS 566
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that late amendments to answers are generally impermissible if the opposing party would be prejudiced or surprised
- recognizing that late amendments to answers are generally impermissible if the opposing party would be prejudiced or surprised
- “[A] party may well assert a limitations period defense in its summary judgment motion ***.”
- \[A] party may well assert a limitations period defense in its summary judgment motion***.\
- \[A] party may well assert a limitations period defense in its summary judgment motion***.\
- “a party may file a motion for summary judgment at any time”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gordon, Burke, Cahill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.