Skip to main content
· 4/29/1996

Medlock v. One 1985 Jeep Cherokee Vin 1JCWB7828FT129001

Citations

  • 470 S.E.2d 373
  • 322 S.C. 127
  • 1996 S.C. LEXIS 64

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding double jeopardy issue must be raised to the trial court to be preserved for appellate review
  • recognizing a contemporaneous objection is required to preserve an issue for appellate review
  • adopting the federal “instrumentality” standard in the context of civil forfeitures for purposes of South Carolina’s “excessive fines” analysis
  • adopting the federal \instrumentality\ standard in the context of civil forfeitures for purposes of South Carolina's \excessive fines\ analysis
  • adopting the federal \instrumentality\ standard in the context of civil forfeitures for purposes of South Carolina's \excessive fines\ analysis
  • stating the appellant has the burden of providing a sufficient record upon which the appellate court can make a decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.