Medlin v. County of Henrico Police

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding in regard to a similar statute that “evidence that merely rebuts generally the underlying premise of the statute, which establishes a causal link between stress and heart disease, is not probative evidence for purposes of overcoming the presumption”
• testimony that only generally refutes the existence of a causal relationship between work-related stress and heart disease is not probative on the question of rebutting the statutory presumption
• testimony that only generally refutes the existence of a causal relationship between work-related stress and heart disease is not probative on the question of rebutting the statutory presumption
• addressing two issues “likely [to] arise again on remand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).