Medix Ambulance Service, Inc. v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding administrative remedies not exhausted with respect to individual defendants who were neither listed as respondents in the administrative charge nor named in the body of the complaint as alleged perpetrators
• declining to 20 dismiss a IIED claim on failure-to-exhaust grounds, finding that while FEHA enshrines a policy 21 against harassment, “a plaintiff may have a valid claim for specific tortuous conduct arising from 22 [such] harassment”
• “The timely filing of an administrative complaint is a prerequisite to the bringing of a civil action for damages under the FEHA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).