Medivas, LLC v. Marubeni Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an order compelling arbitration . . . may not be appealed if the court stays the action pending arbitration”
• holding that “an order compelling arbitration may be appealed if the district court dismisses all the underlying claims, but may not be appealed if the court stays the action pending arbitration”
• adopting “a rebuttable presumption that an order compelling arbitration but not explicitly dismissing the underlying claims stays the action as to those claims pending the completion of the arbitration”
• deferring to agency’s decision to give little weight to letter from 8 applicant’s spouse
• noting “[Ninth Circuit’s] preference for staying an action pending arbitration rather than dismissing it”
• noting a “preference for staying an action pending arbitration rather 8 than dismissing it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).