· 9/28/2011
Meditz v. City of Newark
Citations
- 658 F.3d 364
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19670
- 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,285
- 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 727
- 2011 WL 4470677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disapproving of district court’s merely comparing percentages rather than standard devia- tion analysis
- “We review the District Court’s decision denying the motion to strike for an abuse of discretion.”
- “A district court abuses its discretion [in granting a motion to strike] if its decision rests upon a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Greenaway, Roth
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.