Skip to main content
· 9/28/2011

Meditz v. City of Newark

Citations

  • 658 F.3d 364
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 19670
  • 94 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,285
  • 113 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 727
  • 2011 WL 4470677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disapproving of district court’s merely comparing percentages rather than standard devia- tion analysis
  • “We review the District Court’s decision denying the motion to strike for an abuse of discretion.”
  • “A district court abuses its discretion [in granting a motion to strike] if its decision rests upon a clearly erroneous finding of fact, an errant conclusion of law or an improper application of law to fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Greenaway, Roth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.