Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Medinol conceded that the Fischell '370 Patent was prior art to the patents-in-suit in the Cordis litigation, which included the '120 patent at issue in this case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Katz v. American Airlines, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-02-18· cited 134×
• Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2005-12-27· cited 6×
• Kreinik v. Showbran Photo, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2005-11-10· cited 3×
• MARCTEC, LLC v. Johnson & Johnson
  S.D. Illinois· 2009-06-15· cited 3×
• Orenshteyn v. International Business Machines, Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2013-10-25· cited 3×
• In Re Katz Interactive Processing Patent Litigation
  Federal Circuit· 2011-02-18

Other cases named Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2005-12-27· cited 6×
• MEDINOL LTD. v. Guidant Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2007-08-07· cited 3×
• Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-02-15· cited 2×