Medina v. Sunstate Realty, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a district court erred by excluding evidence of oral modification to a written contract specifying that all changes must be in writing
• contracts are to be interpreted \to give force and effect to the intent of the parties\
• contracts are to be interpreted \to give force and effect to the intent of the parties\
• “The parties to a written contract may modify that contract by express or implied agreement as shown by their words and conduct.”
• “ ‘a written contract may be modified, rescinded or discharged by subsequent oral agreement.’ ” (quoting 4 Samuel Williston & Walter H.E. Jaeger, A Treatise on the Law of Contracts, § 591, at 203 (3d ed.1961))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).