Medina v. Skowron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning courts not “to indulge in specious, ‘post hoc ergo propter hoc’ reasoning; i.e., to permit an inference that simply because the defendants’ action followed the plaintiff’s protected activity, that the former must have been motivated by the latter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).