Skip to main content
· 2/7/2007

Medina v. Multaler, Inc.

Citations

  • 547 F. Supp. 2d 1099
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97017
  • 2007 WL 5124010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that temporal proximity between date employer learned of pregnancy and adverse employment actions suggested discriminatory motive
  • noting the 15 plaintiff would not be able to take the stand at trial and recount statements constituting hearsay
  • sustaining objection to deposition 3 testimony “that ‘Jessica’ told [the deponent] that ‘Delphine’ said that the Muhlethaler sisters had 4 commented that they disliked hiring women of childbearing age because it was bad for business” 5 as triple hearsay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Margaret M. Morrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.