Medina v. Air-Mite Devices, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where reasonable minds could differ about whether the modification to the product was foreseeable, summary judgment was inappropriate
• holding that where reasonable minds could differ about whether the modification to the product was foreseeable, summary judgment was inappropriate
• noting that manifest weight of the evidence is supportive of a determination that has been made by the trier of fact, but it has no bearing on court’s review of summary judgment
• noting that manifest weight of the evidence is supportive of a determination that has been made by the trier of fact, but it has no bearing on court's review of summary judgment
• manufacturer of air press was not shielded from liability when the employer failed to install a safety device on the machine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).