Medina-Rivera v. MVM, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that an alleged retaliator’s “awareness [of protected activity] may be shown by circumstantial evidence”
• explaining that \the employee must show that the retaliator knew about her protected activity\ because \one cannot have been motivated to retaliate by something he was unaware of\
• finding undeveloped an argument that lacked “even a persuasive explanation of what the law should be, assuming [the party] found no authority”
• claiming that Congress never “intended the ADA to have such a reach”
• “developing a sustained argument out of . . . legal precedents” is a party’s “job”
• disregarding plaintiff’s deposition testimony that she did not work certain hours when earnings statements and her statement of material facts said otherwise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).