Medina & Medina, Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the prosecutor stating, “[t]here’s one person in here who has the motive to not tell the truth, and he’s sitting right there[,]” was not vouching
• ruling misconduct may be remedied by district court’s instruction that attorneys’ comments are not evidence
• noting examples of mugshots properly introduced after certain information within the photos was removed prior to admission
• \[T]he misconduct does not amount to fundamental error because a jury instruction was provided that remedied any prejudice.\
• “[T]he misconduct does not amount to fundamental error because a jury instruction was provided that remedied any prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).